divine

Pulsar DFA75 forward unit

Don't buy cheap glass!

Re: Pulsar DFA75 forward unit

Postby rgs101 » Thu Sep 19, 2013 6:19 am

Buffy Vampire Slayer wrote:
rgs101 wrote:
Buffy Vampire Slayer wrote:in that case I would keep the scope and monocular parallel to one another as he suggested and compensate for the difference :thup:


Not a perfect solution esp when paying £1200 fir the unit

I think im favouring the rear units, possibky the ward-d


the rear mounted ones are ok if you've got a neck minus any vertebrae ;)
I can't shoulder the rifle comfortable and it makes me ache :thdn:


The ward-d is one of the smallest, only adds about 80mm so may not be too bad

Worth a try, and return it if to difficult to get on with
.243 Howa 1500
.17hmr browning t-bolt
.22 Ruger 10/22
.22 CZ 452
.22 Colt M4 OPS Carbine
.22 HW100 with pulsar N550
12g mossberg 500A pump
.410 hushpower
User avatar
rgs101
Rifleman
Rifleman
 
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:55 am
Location: Southampton

Re: Pulsar DFA75 forward unit

Postby Born Again » Tue Sep 24, 2013 3:33 pm

It looks to me as if the device has a camera (top) and a screen (bottom). As the camera could actually be pointing in any direction and the screen would still be roughly central on the scope there is big potential for inaccuracy. Add in the extra height of the camera and you have a recipe for trouble.

Rear mounted NV work well, especially if you use a shotgun stock extender.
User avatar
Born Again
Consul Master Hunter
Consul Master Hunter
 
Posts: 2989
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:39 pm
Location: Cardigan

Previous

Return to Scopes, optics and night vision

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests

cron